Does your company sell a
Business to Union product?
Click here to add your company >>

Cherri Senders, Publisher, Labor 411. As a public relations professional specializing in communications for labor unions, Cherri Senders signed an agreement with the Los Angeles Labor Federation that she would “buy union whenever possible.” For years, she’d research her purchases beforehand and armed with her shopping list, she’d live up to her agreement.

“It wasn’t easy,” said Senders. “I had to really do a lot of research. I didn’t know how accurate or reliable my sources were.”

Senders wanted to support good union jobs so she finally decided that the labor movement needed an accurate and up-to-date union shopping guide—full of union-made products and services. And so Labor 411 was born.

On Labor 411's website [www.labor411.org], Senders sums up the guide’s mission: “Working people deserve the support of their neighbors, communities and friends. By making the choice to spend our money on union-made goods and services that are made in our country by workers who are treated fairly, we are helping to protect the middle class, strengthen our national economy and build a stronger America. We call that ethical consumerism…”

Editors note: the March-April 2013 Label Letter newsletter incorrectly identified Labor 411's Website. The correct address is www.labor411.org.

In cutting $84.5 billion from the federal budget in the coming fiscal year (or 7 percent of the federal budget),
and $1.2 trillion over the next 10 years, the Republican majority in the House of Representatives defied White House warnings that the cuts were too deep and arbitrary. Sequestration is the term for taking money away from government programs.

President Obama has maintained all along that arbitrarily cutting the federal budget without taking steps to increase taxes on the wealthiest Americans would hobble the economic recovery and could turn the nation back toward recession.

From the beginning, sequestration was a variation of the old game of chicken, where each side expected the other to blink first.

The process does achieve one of the foremost objectives of the Tea Party and conservative elements of the Republican Party. By taking a meat axe to government programs, sequestration moves the needle closer to the goal of shrinking government down to the point where it can be drowned in the bathtub.

The Republicans were initially gloating because, to date, the pain appears to be localized to government employees—about a million of them who will experience as many as 22 unpaid furlough days, or 20 percent of their income. By mid-March, federal agencies had sent out furlough notices to about a quarter of a million workers.

Federal workers are the prime target of Republican orthodoxy. Just before the sequester began, the House of
Representatives voted down a miniscule pay raise for the federal workforce, continuing a wage freeze into a third year.

There is no indication that the Sequester standoff might be resolved anytime soon. On March 20, Congress passed a stopgap spending bill to keep the government open through the end of September, sidestepping the threat of a government shutdown, but sequestration cuts remain in place at least through September 30.

Like the layers of an onion, the federal budget affects virtually all Americans in many different ways. By the time the full impact of these cuts registers on the average family the damage will be extensive and the process
of restoring vital services expensive, and in some cases, impossible. News accounts estimate that 2.14 million jobs are in danger as a consequence of the sequester and 956,000 of those are “small business jobs” that depend upon government contracts.

Local education funding will feel the pinch, forcing administrators to lay off teachers. Federal funding for police and public safety personnel will be lopped away. Programs such as Head Start, Food Stamps and Unemployment Benefits will feel the pinch.

The impact of the 2013 cuts will see reductions in every government program—from agriculture and airline safety to cuts in the national zoo. The sharpest evidence of public inconvenience will begin in April with the first furloughs. School children planning to visit Washington this Spring won’t be touring the White House and they’ll
have fewer opportunities to see many of the other iconic Washington sites that depend on federal workers. Smithsonian exhibits will be restricted due to understaffing as will the monuments along the National Mall. The
National Weather Service will be forced to postpone modernizing its weather prediction capacity, Social Security and the Internal Revenue Service will experience slowdowns in processing their work. Security lines and delays will grow in airports, air traffic control will be pared down and many small airports in various regions of the country will shut down. Food and meat inspection will be sharply curtailed—forcing some factories to suspend operations when inspectors are not available. Federal law enforcement agencies will experience staff shortages—from the Border Patrol to FBI agents, federal prison facilities, drug and firearm enforcement and others.

Down another layer, billions of dollars in federal contracting will be constricted, cutting down shipbuilding and repair, research and development and the full range of national security expenditures.

Thousands of union members will feel the pinch as skilled craft workers are laid off from big defense contractors
such as Lockheed and Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics. The ripples will threaten jobs in health care, food service, travel, hospitality and more.

Leaders in Congress and the White House continue to hold hopes that a compromise can be reached to reduce the impact of the cuts by taking steps to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals. The hope is
that once average Americans begin to feel the pinch they will bombard members of Congress to demand a resolution.